Subscribe to the CT4F Newsletter to stay informed!
Mar 11, 2026
What Is the Lemon Test, and Why Should Christian Parents of LGBTQ Kids Care About It Right Now?
The Lemon Test was a legal standard courts used for over 40 years to keep the government from favoring one religious viewpoint over others.
Quick Takeaways
The Lemon Test was a legal standard courts used for over 40 years to keep the government from favoring one religious viewpoint over others.
In 2022, the Supreme Court abandoned the Lemon Test, shifting toward a more religion-friendly legal framework.
Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) celebrated this shift and is now using the same Court to argue that therapists should have broad free speech protections to practice "conversion therapy" on minors in Chiles v. Salazar.
If ADF wins, licensed therapists could use unproven, harmful practices on your child with less accountability to state regulators or to you as a parent.
Understanding these shifts helps Christian families see what is at stake when "religious freedom" is used to shield practices that hurt kids.
What Is the Lemon Test?
In 1971, the Supreme Court created a three-part test to decide whether a law crossed the line between government and religion. It came from a case called Lemon v. Kurtzman, and for decades it worked like a checklist. To pass, a law had to have a non-religious purpose, could not primarily help or hurt religion, and could not tangle government too deeply in religious matters.
Think of it as the guardrail that kept the government from picking favorites when it came to faith. It protected Christians just as much as anyone else, because it meant no single group's beliefs could be written into law at the expense of others.
Why Was It Abandoned?
In 2022, the Supreme Court officially set the Lemon Test aside in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, a case about a high school football coach who led prayers after games. The Court replaced it with a standard based on "historical practices and understandings," meaning courts now look at what was traditionally allowed rather than applying a structured checklist.
Alliance Defending Freedom called this a major victory. They had argued for years that the Lemon Test unfairly restricted religious expression.
What Does This Have to Do With Conversion Therapy?
The same Supreme Court that abandoned the Lemon Test is now hearing Chiles v. Salazar, a case that could reshape conversion therapy laws by state across the country. ADF is arguing that Colorado's law banning licensed therapists from practicing these discredited techniques on minors violates free speech.
A Court more open to religious freedom arguments is exactly where ADF wants this case. They are not just asking for a therapist's right to talk freely. They are asking for a framework where states have a harder time regulating what licensed professionals do to children, as long as those professionals frame their work in terms of faith or speech.
For Christian parents, that should raise a red flag. If a therapist can claim free speech protections for practicing "conversion therapy" on your child, state medical boards lose their ability to hold that therapist accountable. Someone could promise to "fix" your child, charge your family thousands of dollars, cause real harm, and face fewer consequences than an unlicensed hairdresser. Courts have already ruled that these promises amount to conversion therapy fraud, as a New Jersey jury found in Ferguson v. JONAH (2015).
Why Christian Parents Should Pay Attention
Colorado's law does not touch pastors, youth ministers, or church counselors. It only applies to state-licensed mental health professionals. The law exists because research shows why conversion therapy is harmful: these practices lead to anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts and behavior in children and teens.
When ADF frames this as a fight for religious freedom, ask yourself: whose freedom? Not the freedom of your child to be protected. Not your freedom as a parent to make decisions without a therapist wedging themselves between you and your kid. The freedom they are fighting for belongs to the practitioner.
Your family's faith is between you and God. But the laws protecting your child from someone with a license and a promise they cannot keep? Those laws matter. And right now, they are at risk.
FAQs
Q: What was the Lemon Test?
A: A three-part standard the Supreme Court used from 1971 to 2022 to evaluate whether a law violated the separation of church and state. A law had to have a non-religious purpose, could not primarily advance or restrict religion, and could not create excessive government involvement with religion.
Q: How does the Lemon Test relate to Chiles v. Salazar?
A: The end of the Lemon Test reflects a broader Supreme Court shift toward expanding religious liberty claims. ADF, which celebrated the Lemon Test's end, now argues in Chiles v. Salazar that Colorado cannot ban "conversion therapy" because doing so violates a therapist's free speech.
Q: Does Chiles v. Salazar affect pastoral counseling?
A: No. Colorado's law applies only to state-licensed mental health professionals. Pastors and religious counselors are not affected.
Q: What can Christian parents do right now?
A: Stay informed about Chiles v. Salazar, argued before the Supreme Court on October 7, 2025, with a decision expected by June 2026. If someone near you is marketing these practices, learn the warning signs before you search for conversion therapy near me. Protecting your child from unproven practices is not a betrayal of your faith.
Q: Is conversion therapy really considered fraud?
A: In Ferguson v. JONAH (2015), a New Jersey jury unanimously ruled that promising to change someone from gay to straight through "conversion therapy" was consumer fraud. The organization was shut down permanently.
Recent posts
Mar 11, 2026
Mar 11, 2026
What Is the Lemon Test, and Why Should Christian Parents of LGBTQ Kids Care About It Right Now?
The Lemon Test was a legal standard courts used for over 40 years to keep the government from favoring one religious viewpoint over others.
Quick Takeaways
The Lemon Test was a legal standard courts used for over 40 years to keep the government from favoring one religious viewpoint over others.
In 2022, the Supreme Court abandoned the Lemon Test, shifting toward a more religion-friendly legal framework.
Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) celebrated this shift and is now using the same Court to argue that therapists should have broad free speech protections to practice "conversion therapy" on minors in Chiles v. Salazar.
If ADF wins, licensed therapists could use unproven, harmful practices on your child with less accountability to state regulators or to you as a parent.
Understanding these shifts helps Christian families see what is at stake when "religious freedom" is used to shield practices that hurt kids.
What Is the Lemon Test?
In 1971, the Supreme Court created a three-part test to decide whether a law crossed the line between government and religion. It came from a case called Lemon v. Kurtzman, and for decades it worked like a checklist. To pass, a law had to have a non-religious purpose, could not primarily help or hurt religion, and could not tangle government too deeply in religious matters.
Think of it as the guardrail that kept the government from picking favorites when it came to faith. It protected Christians just as much as anyone else, because it meant no single group's beliefs could be written into law at the expense of others.
Why Was It Abandoned?
In 2022, the Supreme Court officially set the Lemon Test aside in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, a case about a high school football coach who led prayers after games. The Court replaced it with a standard based on "historical practices and understandings," meaning courts now look at what was traditionally allowed rather than applying a structured checklist.
Alliance Defending Freedom called this a major victory. They had argued for years that the Lemon Test unfairly restricted religious expression.
What Does This Have to Do With Conversion Therapy?
The same Supreme Court that abandoned the Lemon Test is now hearing Chiles v. Salazar, a case that could reshape conversion therapy laws by state across the country. ADF is arguing that Colorado's law banning licensed therapists from practicing these discredited techniques on minors violates free speech.
A Court more open to religious freedom arguments is exactly where ADF wants this case. They are not just asking for a therapist's right to talk freely. They are asking for a framework where states have a harder time regulating what licensed professionals do to children, as long as those professionals frame their work in terms of faith or speech.
For Christian parents, that should raise a red flag. If a therapist can claim free speech protections for practicing "conversion therapy" on your child, state medical boards lose their ability to hold that therapist accountable. Someone could promise to "fix" your child, charge your family thousands of dollars, cause real harm, and face fewer consequences than an unlicensed hairdresser. Courts have already ruled that these promises amount to conversion therapy fraud, as a New Jersey jury found in Ferguson v. JONAH (2015).
Why Christian Parents Should Pay Attention
Colorado's law does not touch pastors, youth ministers, or church counselors. It only applies to state-licensed mental health professionals. The law exists because research shows why conversion therapy is harmful: these practices lead to anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts and behavior in children and teens.
When ADF frames this as a fight for religious freedom, ask yourself: whose freedom? Not the freedom of your child to be protected. Not your freedom as a parent to make decisions without a therapist wedging themselves between you and your kid. The freedom they are fighting for belongs to the practitioner.
Your family's faith is between you and God. But the laws protecting your child from someone with a license and a promise they cannot keep? Those laws matter. And right now, they are at risk.
FAQs
Q: What was the Lemon Test?
A: A three-part standard the Supreme Court used from 1971 to 2022 to evaluate whether a law violated the separation of church and state. A law had to have a non-religious purpose, could not primarily advance or restrict religion, and could not create excessive government involvement with religion.
Q: How does the Lemon Test relate to Chiles v. Salazar?
A: The end of the Lemon Test reflects a broader Supreme Court shift toward expanding religious liberty claims. ADF, which celebrated the Lemon Test's end, now argues in Chiles v. Salazar that Colorado cannot ban "conversion therapy" because doing so violates a therapist's free speech.
Q: Does Chiles v. Salazar affect pastoral counseling?
A: No. Colorado's law applies only to state-licensed mental health professionals. Pastors and religious counselors are not affected.
Q: What can Christian parents do right now?
A: Stay informed about Chiles v. Salazar, argued before the Supreme Court on October 7, 2025, with a decision expected by June 2026. If someone near you is marketing these practices, learn the warning signs before you search for conversion therapy near me. Protecting your child from unproven practices is not a betrayal of your faith.
Q: Is conversion therapy really considered fraud?
A: In Ferguson v. JONAH (2015), a New Jersey jury unanimously ruled that promising to change someone from gay to straight through "conversion therapy" was consumer fraud. The organization was shut down permanently.
Recent posts
Mar 11, 2026
Mar 11, 2026
What Is the Lemon Test, and Why Should Christian Parents of LGBTQ Kids Care About It Right Now?
The Lemon Test was a legal standard courts used for over 40 years to keep the government from favoring one religious viewpoint over others.
Quick Takeaways
The Lemon Test was a legal standard courts used for over 40 years to keep the government from favoring one religious viewpoint over others.
In 2022, the Supreme Court abandoned the Lemon Test, shifting toward a more religion-friendly legal framework.
Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) celebrated this shift and is now using the same Court to argue that therapists should have broad free speech protections to practice "conversion therapy" on minors in Chiles v. Salazar.
If ADF wins, licensed therapists could use unproven, harmful practices on your child with less accountability to state regulators or to you as a parent.
Understanding these shifts helps Christian families see what is at stake when "religious freedom" is used to shield practices that hurt kids.
What Is the Lemon Test?
In 1971, the Supreme Court created a three-part test to decide whether a law crossed the line between government and religion. It came from a case called Lemon v. Kurtzman, and for decades it worked like a checklist. To pass, a law had to have a non-religious purpose, could not primarily help or hurt religion, and could not tangle government too deeply in religious matters.
Think of it as the guardrail that kept the government from picking favorites when it came to faith. It protected Christians just as much as anyone else, because it meant no single group's beliefs could be written into law at the expense of others.
Why Was It Abandoned?
In 2022, the Supreme Court officially set the Lemon Test aside in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, a case about a high school football coach who led prayers after games. The Court replaced it with a standard based on "historical practices and understandings," meaning courts now look at what was traditionally allowed rather than applying a structured checklist.
Alliance Defending Freedom called this a major victory. They had argued for years that the Lemon Test unfairly restricted religious expression.
What Does This Have to Do With Conversion Therapy?
The same Supreme Court that abandoned the Lemon Test is now hearing Chiles v. Salazar, a case that could reshape conversion therapy laws by state across the country. ADF is arguing that Colorado's law banning licensed therapists from practicing these discredited techniques on minors violates free speech.
A Court more open to religious freedom arguments is exactly where ADF wants this case. They are not just asking for a therapist's right to talk freely. They are asking for a framework where states have a harder time regulating what licensed professionals do to children, as long as those professionals frame their work in terms of faith or speech.
For Christian parents, that should raise a red flag. If a therapist can claim free speech protections for practicing "conversion therapy" on your child, state medical boards lose their ability to hold that therapist accountable. Someone could promise to "fix" your child, charge your family thousands of dollars, cause real harm, and face fewer consequences than an unlicensed hairdresser. Courts have already ruled that these promises amount to conversion therapy fraud, as a New Jersey jury found in Ferguson v. JONAH (2015).
Why Christian Parents Should Pay Attention
Colorado's law does not touch pastors, youth ministers, or church counselors. It only applies to state-licensed mental health professionals. The law exists because research shows why conversion therapy is harmful: these practices lead to anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts and behavior in children and teens.
When ADF frames this as a fight for religious freedom, ask yourself: whose freedom? Not the freedom of your child to be protected. Not your freedom as a parent to make decisions without a therapist wedging themselves between you and your kid. The freedom they are fighting for belongs to the practitioner.
Your family's faith is between you and God. But the laws protecting your child from someone with a license and a promise they cannot keep? Those laws matter. And right now, they are at risk.
FAQs
Q: What was the Lemon Test?
A: A three-part standard the Supreme Court used from 1971 to 2022 to evaluate whether a law violated the separation of church and state. A law had to have a non-religious purpose, could not primarily advance or restrict religion, and could not create excessive government involvement with religion.
Q: How does the Lemon Test relate to Chiles v. Salazar?
A: The end of the Lemon Test reflects a broader Supreme Court shift toward expanding religious liberty claims. ADF, which celebrated the Lemon Test's end, now argues in Chiles v. Salazar that Colorado cannot ban "conversion therapy" because doing so violates a therapist's free speech.
Q: Does Chiles v. Salazar affect pastoral counseling?
A: No. Colorado's law applies only to state-licensed mental health professionals. Pastors and religious counselors are not affected.
Q: What can Christian parents do right now?
A: Stay informed about Chiles v. Salazar, argued before the Supreme Court on October 7, 2025, with a decision expected by June 2026. If someone near you is marketing these practices, learn the warning signs before you search for conversion therapy near me. Protecting your child from unproven practices is not a betrayal of your faith.
Q: Is conversion therapy really considered fraud?
A: In Ferguson v. JONAH (2015), a New Jersey jury unanimously ruled that promising to change someone from gay to straight through "conversion therapy" was consumer fraud. The organization was shut down permanently.