Sep 16, 2025
Chiles v Salazar News: Cleary Files Supreme Court Amicus Brief in Chiles v. Salazar, et al. in Support of Colorado’s Statutory Ban on ‘Conversion Therapy’
From Cleary Gottlieb: Cleary Gottlieb filed an amicus brief in support of respondents in Chiles v. Salazar, et al., currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, on behalf of 22 scholars of constitutional law and the First Amendment who are professors and deans in law schools across the U.S.
“Conversion therapy” refers to a range of mental healthcare techniques aimed at changing a patient’s sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. It is the consensus among mental health researchers and major professional organizations that conversion therapy is ineffective and harmful, and that children exposed to it experience increased risks of depression, self-harm, and suicidal ideation. In addition to Colorado, 23 other states and the District of Columbia have passed similar statutes.
Recent posts
Sep 16, 2025
Sep 16, 2025
Chiles v Salazar News: Cleary Files Supreme Court Amicus Brief in Chiles v. Salazar, et al. in Support of Colorado’s Statutory Ban on ‘Conversion Therapy’
From Cleary Gottlieb: Cleary Gottlieb filed an amicus brief in support of respondents in Chiles v. Salazar, et al., currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, on behalf of 22 scholars of constitutional law and the First Amendment who are professors and deans in law schools across the U.S.
“Conversion therapy” refers to a range of mental healthcare techniques aimed at changing a patient’s sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. It is the consensus among mental health researchers and major professional organizations that conversion therapy is ineffective and harmful, and that children exposed to it experience increased risks of depression, self-harm, and suicidal ideation. In addition to Colorado, 23 other states and the District of Columbia have passed similar statutes.
Recent posts
Sep 16, 2025
Sep 16, 2025
Chiles v Salazar News: Cleary Files Supreme Court Amicus Brief in Chiles v. Salazar, et al. in Support of Colorado’s Statutory Ban on ‘Conversion Therapy’
From Cleary Gottlieb: Cleary Gottlieb filed an amicus brief in support of respondents in Chiles v. Salazar, et al., currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, on behalf of 22 scholars of constitutional law and the First Amendment who are professors and deans in law schools across the U.S.
“Conversion therapy” refers to a range of mental healthcare techniques aimed at changing a patient’s sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. It is the consensus among mental health researchers and major professional organizations that conversion therapy is ineffective and harmful, and that children exposed to it experience increased risks of depression, self-harm, and suicidal ideation. In addition to Colorado, 23 other states and the District of Columbia have passed similar statutes.